Eliminating the Electoral College

Loading…

Eliminating the Electoral CollegeStarted by Daphne HallThe debate centers on whether the United States should eliminate the Electoral College in favor of a national popular vote. Proponents of the change argue that the current system is undemocratic because it weights votes unequally across states, allows a candidate to win without a majority of the popular vote, and causes candidates to ignore certain regions. Conversely, the discussion explores whether modern technology has rendered the original justifications for the Electoral College obsolete and if a direct popular vote would improve voter turnout by making every individual vote count.

The Electoral College is undemocratic because it fails to count votes equally, giving disproportionate weight to voters in low-population states while sidelining voters in urban areas and 'safe' states.

The Electoral College distorts the representative opinion of the country by allowing a candidate to win the presidency without winning the national popular vote.

The United States should transition to a national popular vote because modern technology and communication have removed the original justifications for the Electoral College.

A direct popular vote would increase voter turnout by ensuring that every individual vote counts toward the final outcome.

Okay, hi everyone. Today I'm gonna be talking about the Electoral College and more specifically why we should eliminate the Electoral College as a nation. So as we know, the Electoral College has decided who becomes president. And someone needs 270 electoral votes to win the presidency. And it really doesn't matter whether they win the popular vote or not. As we saw in 2016 when Hillary won the popular vote, but Donald Trump won the electoral votes. So he was president in 2016. Anyways, I don't think that the electoral votes count votes equally, and that's kind of a fundamental principle of…Eliminating the Electoral College