Loading…
Started by Daphne Hall
The debate concerns whether the United States should maintain its policy of strategic ambiguity regarding Taiwan and China. Proponents argue that this policy prevents direct provocation of China while preserving the ability to intervene if necessary, and that it allows for military support without perceived interference in internal affairs. Others suggest the policy encourages Taiwan to develop its own independent defense mechanisms rather than relying solely on U.S. military capabilities.
Um, okay, so the topic I want to talk about is um whether the US should maintain its policy on um of strategic ambiguity when it comes to China and Taiwan Taiwanese relations. Um and so my thought process behind this is that yes, the US should maintain its policy um of strategic ambiguity that it's had since the late 70s, early 80s, um, because of the one China policy that basically set the US is saying that um they acknowledge the um China's claim over Taiwan, but they still maintain the ability to um intervene if it came down to it, if it came down to like sovereignty um with Taiwan or if…